2023-07-12 00:58:23,275 INFO  [main] hbase.HBaseClassTestRule(94): Test class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision timeout: 13 mins
2023-07-12 00:58:23,524 WARN  [Time-limited test] impl.MetricsConfig(128): Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-hbase.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
2023-07-12 00:58:23,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] metrics.MetricRegistriesLoader(60): Loaded MetricRegistries class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.impl.MetricRegistriesImpl
2023-07-12 00:58:23,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 00:58:23,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 00:58:23,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=12, OpenFileDescriptor=263, MaxFileDescriptor=60000, SystemLoadAverage=79, ProcessCount=166, AvailableMemoryMB=5571
2023-07-12 00:58:23,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 00:58:23,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 00:58:23,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 00:58:23,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=true, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 00:58:23,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:23,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:23,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:23,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:23,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1783504477=1, srv129834813=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1783504477=1, srv129834813=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1958367607=1, srv1165301679=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1958367607=1, srv1165301679=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1306779846=0, srv1367330740=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1306779846=0, srv1367330740=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:23,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176688726=0, srv1309251797=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176688726=0, srv1309251797=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176688726=0, srv1309251797=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:23,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2013342056=1, srv165015229=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:23,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2013342056=1, srv165015229=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2013342056=1, srv165015229=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2013342056=1, srv165015229=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv720203814=1, srv565186039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1491265266=1, srv1091256530=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:23,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1757151968=1, srv1444064251=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 00:58:23,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 00:58:23,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 00:58:23,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 00:58:23,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 00:58:23,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 00:58:23,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 00:58:23,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 00:58:23,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 00:58:23,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 00:58:23,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 00:58:23,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 00:58:23,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 00:58:23,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 00:58:23,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 00:58:23,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 00:58:23,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 00:58:23,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 00:58:23,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 00:58:23,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 00:58:23,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 00:58:23,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 00:58:23,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 00:58:23,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 00:58:23,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 00:58:23,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 00:58:23,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 00:58:23,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 00:58:23,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:23,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 00:58:24,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 00:58:24,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 00:58:24,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 00:58:24,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 00:58:24,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 00:58:24,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 00:58:24,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 00:58:24,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 00:58:24,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 00:58:24,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 00:58:24,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 00:58:24,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 00:58:24,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 00:58:24,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 00:58:24,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 00:58:24,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 00:58:24,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 00:58:24,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 00:58:24,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 00:58:24,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 00:58:24,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 00:58:24,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 00:58:24,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 00:58:24,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 00:58:24,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 00:58:24,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 00:58:24,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 00:58:24,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 00:58:24,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 00:58:24,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 00:58:24,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 00:58:24,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 00:58:24,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 00:58:24,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 00:58:24,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 00:58:24,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 00:58:24,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 00:58:24,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:24,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 00:58:24,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 00:58:24,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 00:58:24,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 00:58:24,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:24,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 00:58:24,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:24,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 00:58:24,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 00:58:24,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 00:58:24,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 00:58:24,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 00:58:24,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 00:58:24,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 00:58:24,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 00:58:24,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 00:58:24,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 00:58:24,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 00:58:24,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 00:58:24,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 00:58:24,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 00:58:24,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 00:58:24,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 00:58:24,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 00:58:24,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 00:58:24,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 00:58:24,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 00:58:24,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 00:58:24,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:24,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:24,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 00:58:24,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 00:58:24,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 00:58:24,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 00:58:24,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:24,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:24,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:24,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 00:58:24,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:24,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:24,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 00:58:24,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 00:58:24,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 00:58:24,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 00:58:24,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 00:58:24,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 00:58:24,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 00:58:24,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2019685210=0, srv37673940=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:24,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1706896609=0, srv2067401167=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv511058579=1, srv1854388998=0, srv990898880=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv511058579=1, srv1854388998=0, srv990898880=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv226570186=2, srv1509781519=1, srv1348674596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv226570186=2, srv1509781519=1, srv1348674596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv226570186=2, srv1509781519=1, srv1348674596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv196469659=1, srv304515747=2, srv102946152=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv196469659=1, srv304515747=2, srv102946152=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv240124832=2, srv1653163692=1, srv1198780337=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv240124832=2, srv1653163692=1, srv1198780337=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv240124832=2, srv1653163692=1, srv1198780337=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1633718124=1, srv71150955=2, srv116087639=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1633718124=1, srv71150955=2, srv116087639=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1633718124=1, srv71150955=2, srv116087639=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1633718124=1, srv71150955=2, srv116087639=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:24,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv718180126=2, srv493553789=1, srv1471739394=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv91748051=3, srv729333844=2, srv1478642017=1, srv1213269847=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv91748051=3, srv729333844=2, srv1478642017=1, srv1213269847=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv91748051=3, srv729333844=2, srv1478642017=1, srv1213269847=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1726266663=0, srv642015336=2, srv228392106=1, srv738768964=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1726266663=0, srv642015336=2, srv228392106=1, srv738768964=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1726266663=0, srv642015336=2, srv228392106=1, srv738768964=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1726266663=0, srv642015336=2, srv228392106=1, srv738768964=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1703753383=1, srv795452761=3, srv1520484149=0, srv398990924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1703753383=1, srv795452761=3, srv1520484149=0, srv398990924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1703753383=1, srv795452761=3, srv1520484149=0, srv398990924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1703753383=1, srv795452761=3, srv1520484149=0, srv398990924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1703753383=1, srv795452761=3, srv1520484149=0, srv398990924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1661288209=1, srv1572339275=0, srv1723238490=2, srv857274282=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv635685020=2, srv748511136=3, srv1297499049=0, srv1418113258=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv453820894=2, srv641603281=3, srv2002670845=1, srv1667016445=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv266089116=2, srv92182762=3, srv145991382=1, srv127313039=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1433370649=1, srv1227807178=0, srv171041144=2, srv2107275262=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1260547347=0, srv189430289=2, srv893429669=3, srv1263419719=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1669000712=3, srv1536995148=1, srv1029462558=0, srv1582473975=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv439289720=3, srv241257974=2, srv1482436122=0, srv538948628=4, srv1779080084=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv439289720=3, srv241257974=2, srv1482436122=0, srv538948628=4, srv1779080084=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv439289720=3, srv241257974=2, srv1482436122=0, srv538948628=4, srv1779080084=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv439289720=3, srv241257974=2, srv1482436122=0, srv538948628=4, srv1779080084=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 00:58:24,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 00:58:24,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 00:58:24,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 00:58:24,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 00:58:24,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 00:58:24,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 00:58:24,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 00:58:24,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 00:58:24,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 00:58:24,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 00:58:24,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 00:58:24,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 00:58:24,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 00:58:24,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 00:58:24,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 00:58:24,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 00:58:24,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 00:58:24,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 00:58:24,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 00:58:24,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 00:58:24,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 00:58:24,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 00:58:24,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 00:58:24,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 00:58:24,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 00:58:24,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 00:58:24,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 00:58:24,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 00:58:24,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 00:58:24,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 00:58:24,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 00:58:24,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 00:58:24,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 00:58:24,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:24,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 00:58:24,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:24,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 00:58:24,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 00:58:24,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 00:58:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 00:58:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 00:58:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 00:58:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 00:58:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 00:58:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 00:58:24,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 00:58:24,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 00:58:24,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:24,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 00:58:24,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 00:58:24,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:24,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 00:58:24,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 00:58:24,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 00:58:24,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 00:58:24,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-12 00:58:24,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-12 00:58:24,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:24,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 00:58:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 00:58:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 00:58:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 00:58:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv908859426=5, srv1467351732=0, srv1858851660=2, srv1749817985=1, srv263865363=3, srv44509218=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 00:58:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 00:58:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 00:58:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 00:58:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 00:58:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 00:58:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 00:58:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 00:58:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 00:58:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 00:58:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 00:58:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 00:58:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 00:58:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 00:58:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 00:58:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 00:58:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 00:58:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 00:58:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 00:58:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 00:58:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 00:58:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 00:58:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 00:58:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 00:58:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 00:58:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 00:58:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 00:58:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 00:58:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 00:58:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 00:58:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 00:58:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 00:58:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 00:58:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 00:58:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 00:58:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 00:58:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 00:58:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 00:58:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 00:58:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 00:58:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 00:58:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 00:58:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 00:58:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 00:58:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 00:58:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 00:58:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 00:58:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 00:58:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 00:58:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 00:58:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 00:58:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 00:58:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 00:58:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 00:58:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 00:58:25,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 00:58:25,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 00:58:25,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 00:58:25,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 00:58:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 00:58:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 00:58:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 00:58:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 00:58:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 00:58:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 00:58:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-12 00:58:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 00:58:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 00:58:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 00:58:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 00:58:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 00:58:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 00:58:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv89520422=5, srv172896768=2, srv144339775=1, srv554669797=4, srv110720450=0, srv487234166=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv880206358=13, srv1410043783=3, srv911284787=14, srv1309002087=1, srv1979901975=8, srv815344784=12, srv1420681840=4, srv1616760458=7, srv406819638=11, srv1520042319=6, srv1378353923=2, srv1199844154=0, srv1460282861=5, srv2117062579=9, srv341532214=10} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv103535053=1, srv845417690=9, srv1373211479=4, srv2119377267=7, srv754283385=8, srv1022630723=0, srv1840916295=5, srv1861774883=6, srv1064846536=3, srv1059367966=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1660439043=3, srv142532022=1, srv1832028044=4, srv159586943=2, srv1964923499=5, srv550257826=8, srv2087740987=7, srv2010791484=6, srv781202774=9, srv1394782902=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931283977=4, srv1608098527=2, srv2075788935=6, srv239312858=7, srv1160224826=1, srv504318533=8, srv2005650712=5, srv1032932705=0, srv738859247=9, srv1837957675=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1441660245=1, srv356859752=7, srv1097069592=0, srv1942456663=5, srv730297941=8, srv968494990=9, srv1641457221=2, srv1947643135=6, srv1819122671=4, srv1773370171=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1224828649=1, srv2102111971=5, srv1397486041=2, srv1004102863=0, srv552751421=7, srv1698229751=3, srv490775833=6, srv791703501=8, srv938203942=9, srv2087969734=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25179449=8, srv103320773=0, srv1853555511=5, srv1695081412=4, srv1914154714=6, srv1162373307=2, srv1044312945=1, srv201109842=7, srv63834081=9, srv1485791717=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1546351574=4, srv1237422493=1, srv1622605467=5, srv213230034=8, srv1186334471=0, srv1286310199=2, srv193745874=7, srv606097143=9, srv1334049998=3, srv1918025117=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2000873341=5, srv2056503618=6, srv56707459=7, srv723708345=8, srv1450297631=2, srv93914304=9, srv1632483735=3, srv1261644104=0, srv1923979420=4, srv1272197802=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv994986023=9, srv985627395=8, srv123847550=1, srv1769866864=2, srv1147004554=0, srv2095033098=3, srv947455243=7, srv2136394287=4, srv542198380=5, srv783017179=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv317616537=7, srv1215303813=3, srv756699687=8, srv939155058=9, srv1174130561=2, srv1082718095=1, srv1622134048=6, srv1262513293=4, srv1572569158=5, srv1065459572=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv852758301=8, srv899342085=9, srv1739044148=1, srv1889502338=4, srv2041024675=5, srv3030359=6, srv1341438382=0, srv1872993744=3, srv1812115178=2, srv673648478=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1857043238=3, srv1921156310=5, srv247368864=6, srv541157747=7, srv1874909000=4, srv1188793417=0, srv1283089205=1, srv1301309708=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv660435746=6, srv1453307151=1, srv297102298=4, srv1307365632=0, srv298763031=5, srv2035050424=3, srv68475464=7, srv1550637682=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301145973=1, srv779325679=5, srv1017888669=0, srv677113190=4, srv867149936=6, srv931982864=7, srv437124288=2, srv499646235=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1822219543=2, srv959312080=7, srv330281456=5, srv1878413627=3, srv1227103557=0, srv1948992748=4, srv1455220838=1, srv784587471=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1747805221=1, srv2013288879=3, srv1084961247=0, srv35172258=4, srv1803395280=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1747805221=1, srv2013288879=3, srv1084961247=0, srv35172258=4, srv1803395280=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1747805221=1, srv2013288879=3, srv1084961247=0, srv35172258=4, srv1803395280=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1747805221=1, srv2013288879=3, srv1084961247=0, srv35172258=4, srv1803395280=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1747805221=1, srv2013288879=3, srv1084961247=0, srv35172258=4, srv1803395280=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv313512146=254, srv1084778653=13, srv390519064=269, srv1455620232=90, srv569457875=304, srv1906451593=193, srv964012640=388, srv1486021346=102, srv783097796=343, srv1173765144=35, srv1144884207=25, srv127709713=54, srv1121164474=20, srv1153478848=29, srv1767023821=162, srv187057379=181, srv709831067=333, srv203973676=220, srv937552868=378, srv645286567=318, srv938488729=379, srv509803469=293, srv398702919=271, srv1633096126=127, srv1116744971=19, srv1902478013=191, srv647673317=319, srv8714030=364, srv703486465=330, srv2145546713=245, srv1719516724=151, srv1425392992=84, srv801025971=349, srv1341978366=68, srv2049429264=222, srv1197941547=40, srv1969279967=206, srv1377324534=74, srv1145280341=27, srv505866222=292, srv793257999=347, srv2098937142=236, srv2125284428=240, srv864869958=363, srv905671391=373, srv429538065=276, srv1008542285=2, srv1096862455=15, srv973413361=390, srv187014106=180, srv2088190761=231, srv328545316=259, srv875664834=365, srv1760548238=160, srv88743271=369, srv189944606=190, srv163861500=130, srv1843744524=176, srv41629691=272, srv2071701297=226, srv1667613503=137, srv2143084483=242, srv1696015598=146, srv793048370=346, srv572499659=305, srv575670042=306, srv2093109499=232, srv486625064=288, srv799743999=348, srv787198925=344, srv1872799511=182, srv1526056312=112, srv549735499=299, srv559185661=301, srv1072519935=9, srv1509244019=108, srv1183921369=38, srv1022993608=4, srv1624081473=125, srv1254321078=51, srv1572214050=118, srv941515466=380, srv2008734795=216, srv1586576837=120, srv240399201=248, srv724745126=335, srv1337178637=65, srv619020972=311, srv953591584=383, srv146764426=93, srv1918240241=197, srv1690556021=144, srv84289232=357, srv849837894=359, srv1024521418=5, srv1714959368=149, srv862954946=362, srv1242894951=48, srv439925074=278, srv1355638038=69, srv1292118479=57, srv69139623=328, srv915161991=375, srv1881475094=185, srv516748703=296, srv713650=334, srv472007090=285, srv1426066638=85, srv1781937711=166, srv780598974=342, srv841628064=356, srv1755703452=158, srv397690808=270, srv1233881267=47, srv1502276149=106, srv1329807469=63, srv1656633853=135, srv1985309973=208, srv1707270566=148, srv1898931716=189, srv565483949=302, srv1115622845=17, srv520342201=297, srv1676263337=139, srv494777806=289, srv76231559=341, srv1483239310=99, srv1799181512=168, srv704242898=331, srv1228318422=44, srv1760309248=159, srv1763028738=161, srv424327914=275, srv252152960=249, srv429738021=277, srv677958825=326, srv1551562586=115, srv858990641=361, srv2094261608=233, srv210380418=238, srv26196952=251, srv450225457=280, srv419186860=273, srv1523718102=111, srv1924280098=198, srv369975848=264, srv1926404784=199, srv912422829=374, srv1000131200=0, srv1426172955=86, srv162984487=126, srv1485241623=101, srv1686543429=141, srv755943429=339, srv466633982=283, srv2073865118=227, srv1394340794=78, srv60203577=309, srv2083622440=229, srv1927749359=200, srv1723304495=152, srv1724545064=153, srv1638805930=132, srv1279326377=55, srv623622304=312, srv134129311=67, srv369477814=263, srv638985121=316, srv1446594433=88, srv1977169944=207, srv352850284=261, srv587825347=308, srv2000642865=213, srv1494267003=104, srv31992935=256, srv1161328178=33, srv174438738=155, srv1834163549=175, srv757312425=340, srv2143712153=244, srv1195696724=39, srv515583305=295, srv1153510757=30, srv1768294955=164, srv2067364049=225, srv1142451681=24, srv1153819038=31, srv1898829925=188, srv552814831=300, srv372662428=265, srv155870534=117, srv971049800=389, srv627732063=313, srv1869198112=179, srv956282844=384, srv233654134=247, srv37415362=266, srv1396466406=79, srv294649085=253, srv109147738=14, srv882566875=367, srv1878763914=183, srv1748684943=156, srv1850497445=177, srv1244276879=49, srv478752813=287, srv2057280828=223, srv1076280443=11, srv1401279793=80, srv1369277804=71, srv1032377990=6, srv2000211686=212, srv986952949=391, srv1582148246=119, srv67086470=324, srv1177130715=36, srv1825388655=173, srv1512288804=109, srv150237754=107, srv2128785694=241, srv2020287645=218, srv2079277396=228, srv1145207667=26, srv1552969049=116, srv2105311942=239, srv65409690=321, srv1060002566=7, srv849913336=360, srv648340105=320, srv1002970850=1, srv963095879=386, srv1409453004=82, srv569005868=303, srv942325815=381, srv945899519=382, srv2103627376=237, srv322352109=257, srv892039477=370, srv1825017378=171, srv199871075=211, srv845707267=358, srv1255880063=53, srv1281044967=56, srv1605950974=123, srv1376689378=73, srv514988360=294, srv604059614=310, srv1611018342=124, srv1687911309=142, srv163441479=128, srv1472020490=96, srv422136455=274, srv1882919911=187, srv963682709=387, srv1391682374=76, srv1527788312=113, srv1136580321=22, srv893216434=371, srv1936109839=203, srv1881637873=186, srv1945248798=204, srv147041789=95, srv367012807=262, srv2016867404=217, srv546443706=298, srv1772455067=165, srv956303767=385, srv1912931924=196, srv2065376102=224, srv1232940151=46, srv120619211=41, srv1750525547=157, srv375056693=267, srv576354988=307, srv1675765891=138, srv1414119854=83, srv315172264=255, srv473634985=286, srv2097870329=235, srv460116243=282, srv64475221=317, srv1060829736=8, srv1994262516=210, srv1338433253=66, srv803687483=351, srv457358462=281, srv918404547=376, srv627805190=314, srv1390213609=75, srv694800248=329, srv1603665524=122, srv1116645673=18, srv2008109369=215, srv830737326=354, srv1994228628=209, srv1716919218=150, srv385755194=268, srv884940082=368, srv1319560787=61, srv498546519=290, srv753459757=338, srv831720338=355, srv1014192587=3, srv680545348=327, srv881256873=366, srv1661221407=136, srv1903906876=192, srv995752055=392, srv1404959598=81, srv1948509327=205, srv1463268333=91, srv1908132453=194, srv630846432=315, srv1450731231=89, srv163877710=131, srv1153838312=32, srv2037413033=219, srv146515683=92, srv1599304416=121, srv214322923=243, srv672279654=325, srv22354050=246, srv1650167097=134, srv1767090606=163, srv659642316=322, srv324202106=258, srv113863966=23, srv1489929251=103, srv2003239431=214, srv1824790954=170, srv1228183625=43, srv331334908=260, srv748913656=337, srv1163580316=34, srv133705071=64, srv1371417258=72, srv1485229235=100, srv1436815854=87, srv896275590=372, srv2046739375=221, srv1481688545=98, srv1638166741=129, srv668061919=323, srv1787334500=167, srv132921866=62, srv2094737167=234, srv801626878=350, srv739389868=336, srv1308678749=59, srv1308765167=60, srv709725669=332, srv1306924322=58, srv2083805798=230, srv813562344=352, srv1475816583=97, srv1855413966=178, srv1254682196=52, srv1643196589=133, srv1815566270=169, srv502193022=291, srv1182249416=37, srv470994001=284, srv1698683240=147, srv44016717=279, srv1367677868=70, srv1253538406=50, srv256643582=250, srv108244113=12, srv1735611426=154, srv1828849965=174, srv1931479813=202, srv789242991=345, srv1128997922=21, srv1226264975=42, srv1681375106=140, srv822665556=353, srv1072961549=10, srv1230506160=45, srv1519685398=110, srv1928521596=201, srv1150793888=28, srv1393576331=77, srv1910401457=195, srv1538814364=114, srv146993418=94, srv1880141935=184, srv1693663019=145, srv1825240491=172, srv288943720=252, srv1106670272=16, srv919004566=377, srv1688992627=143, srv1498116931=105} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 00:58:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1041026761=0, srv1061685268=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=3200
2023-07-12 00:58:26,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 25 ms to try 3200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv61923326=1, srv155331647=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1475940726=0, srv1971566870=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1589280=0, srv2016876113=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2117428759=0, srv29378021=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv999010269=1, srv1306142440=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085126037=0, srv762193519=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv494281705=1, srv2120201395=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:26,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.6932409012131716 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.8); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1231442247=0, srv828436237=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1432, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.40878413881917497 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4717368961973279); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1269495912=0, srv1777351491=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=53, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.034662045060658585 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.04000000000000001); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1942190910=1, srv1219267748=0, srv310504095=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608543, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608543 to a new imbalance of 0.004043905257076833. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3333333333333333); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv654600683=2, srv1085956405=0, srv1227632590=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.25015176308042714 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.2886751345948129); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1957843736=1, srv576533618=2, srv1337550716=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-12 00:58:27,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 16 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2888503755054882 to a new imbalance of 0.0030329289428076256. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.25); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv715161529=2, srv373177044=1, srv1918117103=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 8 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1060687626=0, srv46535444=2, srv1155601515=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-12 00:58:27,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 12 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1163064409=0, srv1209431835=1, srv612905492=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=20, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.42216593343109815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=96000
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 141 ms to try 96000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 13 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.42216593343109815 to a new imbalance of 0.003942807625649913. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.325); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1407954357=1, srv307256121=2, srv1185142643=0, srv347884586=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.25526148491585815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 19 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.25526148491585815 to a new imbalance of 0.0020219526285384167. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.16666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv231982909=1, srv34032058=3, srv249280802=2, srv174375465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=12800
2023-07-12 00:58:27,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 12 ms to try 12800 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.009098786828422877. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.75); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv411915773=2, srv1903867733=1, srv1231628789=0, srv415371371=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=16000
2023-07-12 00:58:27,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 17 ms to try 16000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.007279029462738302. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv627399135=2, srv1193275409=0, srv812204613=3, srv2136890387=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608542, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=38400
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 40 ms to try 38400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 6 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608542 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1931157213=0, srv316091591=1, srv691216085=3, srv682039971=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6127441778046339, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=25600
2023-07-12 00:58:27,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 26 ms to try 25600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6127441778046339 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv483231018=3, srv1503204680=1, srv1228183568=0, srv185101924=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6852343510309111, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 24 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6852343510309111 to a new imbalance of 0.006932409012131715. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5714285714285714); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv488481878=2, srv1179206851=0, srv1456205207=1, srv523081190=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1104573291=0, srv546505898=3, srv370527988=2, srv213272734=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0962834585018294 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.11111111111111113); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv700238530=3, srv1694939227=1, srv1292862865=0, srv241191174=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.17331022530329285 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.19999999999999996); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv153522229=0, srv1674913678=1, srv1823015740=2, srv312447597=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-12 00:58:27,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 25 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 5 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008665511265164644. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.7142857142857143); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1262320042=2, srv1058208863=0, srv1116626832=1, srv1579338618=3, srv688058934=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.22705408170595567 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.26202041028867284); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1100986311=0, srv95968073=5, srv410944179=4, srv1587646017=2, srv1905290819=3, srv1292155798=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:27,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:27,431 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:14448000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 00:58:27,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.38476461962415054, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 00:58:40,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 13412 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1018 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.38476461962415054 to a new imbalance of 0.004103018822296562. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3382059800664452); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:40,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:40,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv980279128=5, srv1273492521=0, srv520377189=3, srv1559222915=1, srv757392592=4, srv442840605=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:40,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:40,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:40,875 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:16800000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 00:58:40,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2979275647131677, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 00:58:56,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 15517 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 920 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2979275647131677 to a new imbalance of 0.003188908145580589. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.26285714285714284); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:56,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv477732810=13, srv1671595973=7, srv1481501795=4, srv1655244020=6, srv1910385739=10, srv2143784635=12, srv1273851157=3, srv1783097408=9, srv1002312570=0, srv124268709=1, srv1776284610=8, srv1947578713=11, srv1270943671=2, srv1487644031=5, srv594963997=14} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=15, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.12507588154021357 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.14433756729740646); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:56,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1648644428=2, srv350661868=5, srv396053613=6, srv918292835=9, srv1708471223=3, srv490535844=7, srv160961063=1, srv1786829949=4, srv1403306349=0, srv55889493=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-12 00:58:56,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 92 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 9 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010918544194107453. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv698269380=7, srv1880085016=2, srv618972157=5, srv1140831137=0, srv188217394=3, srv1716714638=1, srv483929506=4, srv773586809=9, srv708053224=8, srv62552712=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.055531997651093117 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.06408392528936147); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:56,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv302060898=6, srv1296424732=0, srv678114830=8, srv1844842387=3, srv811591501=9, srv1946326705=5, srv1724888997=2, srv51948981=7, srv1721057228=1, srv18687055=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=54, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:56,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164644, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=432000
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 622 ms to try 432000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 48 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164644 to a new imbalance of 0.01078374735220489. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8888888888888888); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv381569293=6, srv1808129325=2, srv1980882990=4, srv1699107982=1, srv1898782162=3, srv845481309=9, srv484997828=8, srv1478573780=0, srv402482563=7, srv328486261=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:57,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:57,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:57,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:57,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=55, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:57,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:57,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=440000
2023-07-12 00:58:57,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 735 ms to try 440000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 49 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010808255868914448. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8909090909090909); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:57,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1681069419=3, srv1305134320=0, srv1587240089=1, srv1936765455=4, srv363760666=7, srv2074838667=5, srv370219603=8, srv1603834891=2, srv226502523=6, srv833641399=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:57,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=448000
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 656 ms to try 448000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 50 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010831889081455806. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8928571428571429); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1263578220=2, srv704273096=9, srv435158195=7, srv2119566101=6, srv44928282=8, srv1561623551=4, srv1178307746=1, srv1120327363=0, srv1853879218=5, srv1472324990=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=16, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=128000
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 160 ms to try 128000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 14 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01061525129982669. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.875); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv168019831=3, srv633062220=9, srv1837382794=6, srv1802255559=5, srv550366760=8, srv412831807=7, srv1088521286=0, srv1280668255=2, srv1149566050=1, srv1801183461=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.30649131741006164 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.35369098029121115); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv513659811=4, srv430951172=3, srv532383531=5, srv587068462=6, srv1751374725=1, srv841469601=9, srv621625363=7, srv1750754125=0, srv713799793=8, srv304949323=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=9, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.34662045060658575 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.39999999999999997); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1351333262=0, srv208343408=5, srv1681315900=1, srv1706494069=2, srv7270932=7, srv1874367090=3, srv1935198223=4, srv671805843=6, srv747021698=8, srv880587820=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3851338340073176 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.44444444444444453); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv700913583=7, srv302808341=4, srv236438799=2, srv273844140=3, srv700603257=6, srv872559575=9, srv357136852=5, srv748824845=8, srv229483008=1, srv2000217011=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=123, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8002334382626535 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.923469387755102); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv601337959=6, srv491805959=5, srv748756651=9, srv2138531352=4, srv1294480120=0, srv660826155=7, srv1338876240=1, srv1629330155=3, srv691053029=8, srv1440166490=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=155, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8131812243798632 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9384111329343621); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1802183152=2, srv622028096=6, srv903290001=7, srv320089010=3, srv355456568=4, srv47000067=5, srv1699697618=1, srv1434562738=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.05755254949858986 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0664156421213727); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv133902342=1, srv1593801070=3, srv1267737831=0, srv224722676=4, srv961915814=7, srv681408900=5, srv919797214=6, srv1521334103=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.06673965003400768 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.07701755613924488); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1975487988=0, srv228515183=3, srv395000581=4, srv633564453=5, srv2003366540=1, srv995255438=7, srv2123776392=2, srv963195505=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=130, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.28093705674099306 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.32420136347910594); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv623224090=7, srv1105349713=1, srv1182842654=3, srv1104123123=0, srv1180134445=2, srv1378490151=4, srv1928331469=5, srv406420185=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=140, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.07533492111851356 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.08693649897076465); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2134316138=1, srv991252161=4, srv752063237=3, srv1700631869=0, srv414609261=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.21663778162911612, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-12 00:58:58,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 89 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.21663778162911612 to a new imbalance of 0.0024263431542461008. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 00:58:58,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1063146001=12, srv2032873638=227, srv697192746=344, srv1569752181=123, srv267919958=267, srv1382174612=75, srv406410521=288, srv1166290155=33, srv1574396005=124, srv1370506498=72, srv739142950=352, srv1531014232=114, srv2006621156=220, srv1914837076=201, srv1014267171=0, srv603285181=331, srv1512257412=109, srv1255695412=51, srv1500062053=105, srv1561411984=122, srv1332828739=65, srv1142715970=23, srv137838262=73, srv849817968=370, srv1531591538=115, srv1770372119=169, srv734940245=351, srv555909520=317, srv43492470=293, srv1541902171=117, srv1276438252=54, srv1591124690=132, srv1020169310=4, srv568544965=318, srv1746584433=163, srv1238592715=47, srv1512233885=108, srv1556928868=121, srv1066345247=13, srv1748651796=164, srv1862092378=190, srv2081355044=239, srv1760835351=166, srv610017548=332, srv2016494395=223, srv830920185=367, srv781893505=359, srv1972479492=213, srv2075331163=238, srv1469419767=98, srv1124953189=21, srv1094658155=19, srv1586368674=130, srv1594858195=136, srv2060832822=235, srv227468174=257, srv859440833=373, srv1084703288=17, srv2132687034=249, srv221376764=255, srv1552746074=119, srv456274955=296, srv852288994=371, srv168848521=150, srv891524965=378, srv97878515=389, srv1952296814=211, srv197674144=215, srv460373093=297, srv548688320=314, srv1356096215=70, srv294549044=272, srv1397428097=80, srv1828488862=186, srv152635910=113, srv259948478=264, srv1627689040=140, srv553949961=316, srv997670300=392, srv1734308045=158, srv542625769=313, srv1974453190=214, srv1379587546=74, srv686360970=341, srv1168176474=35, srv1201628902=41, srv1425704396=90, srv1479518638=100, srv225115745=256, srv1823784724=185, srv241466474=261, srv1929924725=208, srv876381605=377, srv871568873=376, srv306487245=273, srv1062266578=11, srv568895329=319, srv1018173870=3, srv598404344=328, srv1419416959=86, srv809859798=363, srv1420586100=88, srv2042554927=230, srv1273331230=53, srv1288078565=58, srv1807858884=176, srv2138135726=251, srv713970196=347, srv444107057=295, srv1393569267=77, srv15773956=126, srv1521973452=112, srv1043388630=10, srv1487698111=103, srv642619893=336, srv382381512=285, srv1814534839=180, srv1994445841=216, srv124572161=49, srv1249297980=50, srv1726580559=156, srv2132790952=250, srv1261043711=52, srv1684271064=149, srv1926017465=205, srv731833673=350, srv129794400=60, srv1598714135=137, srv1619128698=139, srv1585089873=129, srv221123307=254, srv482652655=303, srv1195148430=39, srv1409642704=82, srv1763621040=167, srv510808583=306, srv580913837=324, srv378682753=283, srv1209559062=42, srv1581882516=127, srv1810245921=177, srv810288316=364, srv1198438885=40, srv848150235=369, srv469922872=299, srv1212587315=43, srv81246843=366, srv1720062526=154, srv173916762=161, srv1780342937=170, srv649135357=337, srv758903156=354, srv2019189436=225, srv1814699381=181, srv1947400624=209, srv263753102=266, srv2067598236=237, srv1706962821=152, srv1554458982=120, srv186373301=191, srv2063314777=236, srv1918876251=204, srv90929119=381, srv767691201=356, srv811334256=365, srv1027331190=8, srv2027204656=226, srv1172048537=36, srv408022283=289, srv475257821=301, srv1794325301=174, srv724374485=349, srv2144227608=253, srv1813437662=179, srv1517054468=111, srv1158771696=30, srv551176193=315, srv667384161=339, srv1577033867=125, srv1228486370=44, srv1355744767=69, srv2036016765=229, srv268019672=268, srv588535745=326, srv1815768420=182, srv181336759=178, srv165174021=141, srv345089713=280, srv514270417=307, srv283027663=271, srv1665265557=146, srv1947610235=210, srv1014926269=1, srv2110714245=242, srv2042963396=231, srv59980251=329, srv1446168823=92, srv461710808=298, srv1069195650=15, srv1788067057=173, srv801247518=361, srv94715012=385, srv856428971=372, srv147657172=99, srv1341308452=67, srv1278240541=55, srv178155607=171, srv1928509959=207, srv1414106335=83, srv796998868=360, srv240915274=260, srv1669341444=147, srv187948304=195, srv1419955783=87, srv2125813047=245, srv172327039=155, srv1458511090=96, srv1706494266=151, srv1677970366=148, srv380625770=284, srv1342578771=68, srv1730722681=157, srv61794652=334, srv1067295178=14, srv1015867513=2, srv1591185192=133, srv922210161=382, srv114554971=26, srv1757959878=165, srv1306894132=61, srv228092511=258, srv2126639872=246, srv1545349767=118, srv675966072=340, srv1429404529=91, srv689234811=342, srv1025147164=7, srv342415301=279, srv1446853794=93, srv158390980=128, srv948353725=387, srv1712336360=153, srv759324831=355, srv867264067=375, srv534537232=311, srv529873132=309, srv831600289=368, srv280434129=270, srv439107274=294, srv613918210=333, srv1594476039=135, srv1926448027=206, srv498837864=305, srv1891818607=197, srv1914307137=200, srv2113187068=243, srv588177462=325, srv801352911=362, srv1101758453=20, srv515938879=308, srv2093787813=240, srv400465342=287, srv473758790=300, srv861812482=374, srv1287324796=57, srv369651684=282, srv579722371=323, srv1850686449=189, srv657717031=338, srv707906056=346, srv1784901783=172, srv576712938=322, srv1021519488=6, srv2005278219=219, srv1818417621=183, srv1160816124=31, srv1020606281=5, srv1539968887=116, srv1902118570=198, srv2047546998=233, srv19957692=217, srv1591727879=134, srv1655384792=144, srv1822104295=184, srv1397063811=79, srv1143104115=24, srv118770406=38, srv433223629=292, srv1654423871=143, srv1127315=22, srv248795055=262, srv1460645184=97, srv628221766=335, srv939806211=384, srv602847376=330, srv571547709=321, srv399918301=286, srv570150444=320, srv1423207050=89, srv99734620=391, srv1737317572=160, srv1869022272=193, srv768778994=357, srv893578626=379, srv2102378636=241, srv323549794=276, srv1228723939=45, srv1455201095=94, srv191604669=202, srv538373995=312, srv2127092403=247, srv1367277216=71, srv1908944=199, srv252252318=263, srv2034595955=228, srv1321089316=63, srv4938859=304, srv1865118352=192, srv148713114=102, srv150563251=106, srv2018115245=224, srv2007506504=221, srv530875144=310, srv1455202056=95, srv956067764=388, srv1917702682=203, srv260947246=265, srv70285531=345, srv318702430=275, srv947822478=386, srv18500627=188, srv1241765960=48, srv1603462263=138, srv904566994=380, srv1280014950=56, srv214006920=252, srv1590453283=131, srv1836411035=187, srv1293472409=59, srv780892342=358, srv41236744=291, srv1479542040=101, srv2049939770=234, srv1396230526=78, srv1079488497=16, srv1157234975=29, srv1161951050=32, srv1393545400=76, srv2115123817=244, srv1663258081=145, srv1034268696=9, srv114911615=27, srv180599369=175, srv1173800324=37, srv1408502286=81, srv1230115854=46, srv307585110=274, srv2001595244=218, srv690193951=343, srv1736037020=159, srv1739400665=162, srv1316779201=62, srv357566994=281, srv238062146=259, srv2131233122=248, srv750329399=353, srv1329751026=64, srv411398163=290, srv936263298=383, srv1334284388=66, srv1414669829=84, srv980540888=390, srv1152711692=28, srv2045040468=232, srv1145258988=25, srv1417980631=85, srv1088652204=18, srv333467511=278, srv1963165444=212, srv1652748928=142, srv1764629526=168, srv477603914=302, srv1499138807=104, srv718943300=348, srv1516769033=110, srv275984098=269, srv592348070=327, srv1168120083=34, srv1507269169=107, srv1870090478=194, srv2007630144=222, srv1889753973=196, srv330267232=277} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 00:58:58,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 00:58:58,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 00:58:58,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 00:58:58,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 00:58:58,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 00:58:58,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 00:58:58,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 00:58:58,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 00:58:58,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 00:58:58,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 00:58:58,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 00:58:58,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 00:58:58,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999982); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:58:58,794 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:17606400 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 00:58:58,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164629, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999982); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 00:59:03,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 4653 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 55 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164629 to a new imbalance of 0.011915077989601387. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9821428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 00:59:03,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 00:59:03,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-12 00:59:03,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(175): after: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=13 (was 12)
Potentially hanging thread: Time-limited test.slowlog.append-pool-0
	sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:47)
	com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:56)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.processEvents(BatchEventProcessor.java:159)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:125)
	java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
 - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=263 (was 263), MaxFileDescriptor=60000 (was 60000), SystemLoadAverage=128 (was 79) - SystemLoadAverage LEAK? -, ProcessCount=165 (was 166), AvailableMemoryMB=5188 (was 5571)